Welcome to CPH Theory Siteبه سایت نظریه سی پی اچ خوش آمدید



نظریه سی پی اچ بر اساس تعمیم سرعت نور از انرژی به ماده بنا شده است.

CPH Theory is based on generalized the light velocity from energy into mass.


The formal understanding of antimatter is wrong




Does the universe contain equal amounts of matter and antimatter?

The Big Bang should have created equal amounts of matter and antimatter in the early universe. But today, everything we see from the smallest life forms on Earth to the largest stellar objects is made almost entirely of matter. Comparatively, there is not much antimatter to be found. Something must have happened to tip the balance. One of the greatest challenges in physics is to figure out what happened to the antimatter, or why we see an asymmetry between matter and antimatter.  Read More.


Antimatter atom trapped and measured with a laser for first time

Antimatter is notoriously difficult to work with, because the moment it touches normal matter both annihilate in an explosion of smaller particles and radiation. To scrutinise antimatter, physicists have to keep it as cold as possible and trap it using powerful magnetic fields.
Jeffrey Hangst and his colleagues in the ALPHA collaboration, based at CERN near Geneva, Switzerland, managed to trap 14 antihydrogen atoms at once - a dramatic improvement over the one or two atoms of previous experiments. To peek at the spectrum, they shone an intense laser on to the antihydrogen atoms, so that the beam's energy could be absorbed and re-emitted.
The team found that the lowest-energy photons in the antihydrogen spectrum had the same wavelength as for hydrogen.
Because no one has persuaded an atom of antimatter to interact with a laser before, the measurement is still vastly less precise than our best observations for hydrogen.
Improving the accuracy might flag up any possible discrepancies in energy levels between the two, which would undermine the standard model of physics. Read More.


Searching for antihydrogen,

What is wrong in formal concept of antimatter?

If we want to resolve the matter - antimatter problem radically, we need to review the Dirac's Equation and Sea carefully by a new approach on the antimatter concept.

The root of the problem can be attributed to the left side of the E=mc2 relation. This means that this property is attributed to sub-particle rather than quantum of energy, too and the problem is generally discussed up to finding its solution. The Dirac's Equation is usually limited to the high energy photons and the pair production and decay of a particle - antiparticle, while Dirac's Sea can be used for all quanta of energies. In relativistic quantum mechanics, the problem is that Dirac equations cannot explain virtual pair production and decay in a vacuum. That's why uncertainty principle is used to justify the virtual pair production and decay in vacuum. Richard Feynman propounded the behavior of elementary particles calculation in series diagrams that is called Feynman diagrams that includes also virtual pair production and decay of the vacuum.

Therefore, in CPH theory, defining the structure of photon by means of Dirac equation is in fact a physical reality that not only it satisfies about positrons but also it is an inseparable part of the nature and even we can say that weyl-fermions with spin 1/2 are massless unlike electrons and possess a high degree of mobility; In addition, the spin (rotation) of particle is accomplished either in its side or against its side that can be concluded from it. (It comes back to definition of CPH theory).

With the generalization the Dirac's Equation and Sea, the similarity between QCD and photon can be resulted. In other words, there are color properties not only of in quarks, but the existences of their properties are acceptable in photon structure and even in a gravitational field, too.


Other relative articles:


What is the universe made of? How did it start?

A Theory of Everything and before the Big Bang

The concept of a point-like particle is wrong

The formal understanding of antimatter is wrong

Does EVERYTHING happen at the same time, really?

What is light charged Higgs boson scenario, really?


All Nobel Laureates in Physics

Contains: names, biographies and lectures


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Newest articles







CPH Theory in Journals


General Science Journal

World Science Database

Hadronic Journal

National Research Council Canada

Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics

Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Science

Sub quantum space and interactions from photon to fermions and bosons

Interesting articles

English Articles

Faster Than Light 

Light that travels…faster than light!

Before the Big Bang

Structure of Charge Particles

Move Structure of Photon

Structure of Charge Particles

Faster Than Light 

Light that travels…faster than light!

Before the Big Bang

Structure of Charge Particles

Move Structure of Photon

Structure of Charge Particles

Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equation [PDF]

Speed of Light and CPH Theory [PDF]

Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPH [PDF]

Sub-Quantum Chromodynamics [PDF]

Effective Nuclear Charge [PDF]

Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Field [PDF]

 Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPH [PDF]

Questions and Answers on CPH Theory [PDF]

Opinions on CPH Theory [PDF]

Analysis of CPH Theory

Definition, Principle and Explanation of CPH Theory [PDF]

Experimental Foundation of CPH Theory [PDF]

Logical Foundation of CPH Theory [PDF]

A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge Particles [PDF]

CPH Theory and Newton's Second Law [PDF]

CPH Theory and Special Relativity [PDF]

Properties of CPH [PDF]

Time Function and Work Energy Theorem [PDF]

Time Function and Absolute Black Hole [PDF] 

Thermodynamic Laws, Entropy and CPH Theory [PDF]

Vocabulary of CPH Theory [PDF] 

Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theory [PDF] 

Summary of Physics Concepts [PDF]

Unification and CPH Theory [PDF] 

Strong Interaction and CPH Theory [PDF]


Since 1962 I doubted on Newton's laws. I did not accept the infinitive speed and I found un-vivid the laws of gravity and time.

I learned the Einstein's Relativity, thus I found some answers for my questions. But, I had another doubt of Infinitive Mass-Energy. And I wanted to know why light has stable speed?





free hit counters

Copyright © 2004 CPH Theory . All rights reserved.