The fundamental particles of the universe that physicists have identified - photon, electron, neutrino, quark and so on, are the letters of all matter. Just like their linguistic counterparts, they appear to have no further internal substructure. CPH theory proclaims otherwise. According to CPH theory, if we could examine these particles with even greater precision, a precision many orders of magnitude beyond our present technological capacity, we would find that each is not pointlike but instead consists of a tiny, Each particle contains a lot of sub particle that are moving, oscillating, dancing that calls CPH. CPH is moving continual with constant amount of speed Vc so that;

grad Vc=0 in all inertial frames in any space.

They absorb each other in space. Then they take spin. When CPH has spin it call graviton. Graviton is a particle that does carry gravity force. When density of gravitons increase in space, they combine with each other and convert into energy. In fact force and energy are equivalent. Any effort for finding a unified theory without consider to conversion force and energy will has no success.

Article of above picture;

 
 Hi Mike,

One more, this time focusing on Hossein's CPH.

Hossein's principle issue is the conversion of
force and energy and I feel that he has proposed
something very good.

Allen Francom 

Other Opinions

Greetings;

I was born in Tehran in 1949. I have been familiar with Newton’s laws in 1961

Since 1962 I doubted on Newton’s laws. I did not accept the infinitive speed and I found un-vivid the laws of gravity and time.

I learned the Einstein’s Relativity, thus I found some answers for my questions. But, I had another doubt of Infinitive Mass-Energy. And I wanted to know why light has stable speed?

Well, I wanted to know what is the basis of time. Then I asked, is there any event that time has not effect on it?

On 1972 I was asking to myself why in the low speeds (v<<c) the Relativity becomes to classical mechanics?  And why for the great bodies (solids) the Quantum mechanics becomes to classic mechanics?

Is there any law that could cover the Relativity, Quantum mechanics and classic mechanics? Extremity I believed that we must reconsider the Newton's second law and Quantum mechanics and Relativity at the same time.

My courage had result on 1987, and I could introduce the design The Theory of CPH. After 25 years working, I could write all of my experiences on some texts, and formula.

I published book’s Development Scientific Theories in 1991 in Persian, I propounded CPH Theory on it.

According CPH Theory we are able to combine classical mechanics, quantum mechanics Relativity and Higg.