Welcome to CPH Theory Siteبه سایت نظریه سی پی اچ خوش آمدید



نظریه سی پی اچ بر اساس تعمیم سرعت نور از انرژی به ماده بنا شده است.

CPH Theory is based on generalized the light velocity from energy into mass.


Physics: Being and Time





Understanding of being and time has always been interesting and difficult for mankind. Generally, there are three approaches of religion, philosophy and science to being and time. In this essay, I have reviewed physical being and time, because everything in nature is a physical entity. The question is what relationship is between being and time and whether in physics, being and time are separable? In this essay, I have answered these questions.

In the early days; physics was a part of the philosophy. Before Newton, physics was descriptive and analytic, and physicists had not used mathematics yet, so physics was closer to philosophy than science. For this reason, Newton had named his book "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy".

Still we are using philosophical concepts in the physics. One of these concepts is phenomenon. According to Kant, it is vital always to distinguish between the distinct realms of phenomena and noumena. Phenomena are the appearances, which constitute our experience; noumena are the (presumed) things themselves, which constitute reality.

Phenomenon of a physical event can be different for different observers. Even the fact of a physical event can be something different from the phenomenon of all observers. For example, thousands years everybody thought that the earth is the center of the universe, sun and the planets orbit around the Earth. The appearance of the solar system in the minds of the people is an Earth central system. Another phenomenon that is on everyone's mind at the time it was created, was that each object must be connected to a physical object or placed on it. The question was: Where is the earth standing? That's why some people thought the Earth was on turtle. For example; the Ptolemaic Model was based on common phenomena that earth was the center of the universe. But Copernicus system was based on himself phenomena*.

We are not seeing the world out of it. We are a small part of the world that we live in. Also, no picture covers all the landscape, the physical events are not in our minds, and we will process our personal phenomena in mind that usually are far from the reality.

We describe a personal phenomenon, it will bring judgment and the others are compared with the phenomenon itself. In discussion, a common phenomenon will be created that is closer to reality. The history of science shows that even a common human phenomenon isn�t all reality. Physicists in order to make the joint phenomenon close together and prevent dispersion of votes and results used mathematical models.

Therefore physicists used mathematics to describe reality. Kelvin said: "When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it".

Scientific theories do not show the laws of nature, but are our understanding of physical phenomena to explain the nature and closeness of the common phenomena to the dominating rules of nature. So no theory is perfect, even if expressed with mathematical formulas.


* Ptolemy's model (left side) was based on general common phenomenon (opinion) that was thought earth was the center of universe. But Copernicus's model (right side) was based on his own personal phenomenon (opinion), this is why the majority of people opposed it.



General Science Journal




All Nobel Laureates in Physics

Contains: names, biographies and lectures


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Newest articles







CPH Theory in Journals


General Science Journal

World Science Database

Hadronic Journal

National Research Council Canada

Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics

Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Science

Sub quantum space and interactions from photon to fermions and bosons

Interesting articles

English Articles

Faster Than Light 

Light that travels…faster than light!

Before the Big Bang

Structure of Charge Particles

Move Structure of Photon

Structure of Charge Particles

Faster Than Light 

Light that travels…faster than light!

Before the Big Bang

Structure of Charge Particles

Move Structure of Photon

Structure of Charge Particles

Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equation [PDF]

Speed of Light and CPH Theory [PDF]

Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPH [PDF]

Sub-Quantum Chromodynamics [PDF]

Effective Nuclear Charge [PDF]

Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Field [PDF]

 Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPH [PDF]

Questions and Answers on CPH Theory [PDF]

Opinions on CPH Theory [PDF]

Analysis of CPH Theory

Definition, Principle and Explanation of CPH Theory [PDF]

Experimental Foundation of CPH Theory [PDF]

Logical Foundation of CPH Theory [PDF]

A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge Particles [PDF]

CPH Theory and Newton's Second Law [PDF]

CPH Theory and Special Relativity [PDF]

Properties of CPH [PDF]

Time Function and Work Energy Theorem [PDF]

Time Function and Absolute Black Hole [PDF] 

Thermodynamic Laws, Entropy and CPH Theory [PDF]

Vocabulary of CPH Theory [PDF] 

Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theory [PDF] 

Summary of Physics Concepts [PDF]

Unification and CPH Theory [PDF] 

Strong Interaction and CPH Theory [PDF]


Since 1962 I doubted on Newton's laws. I did not accept the infinitive speed and I found un-vivid the laws of gravity and time.

I learned the Einstein's Relativity, thus I found some answers for my questions. But, I had another doubt of Infinitive Mass-Energy. And I wanted to know why light has stable speed?





free hit counters

Copyright © 2004 CPH Theory . All rights reserved.