C reative
Particle
Higgs
CPH Theory is based on Generalized light velocity from energy into mass.
CPH Theory in Journals
|
Quantum Gravity Chromo Dynamics (QGCD)
|
|
Quantum Gravity Chromo Dynamics (QGCD)
H. Javadia and F. Forouzbakhshb
a) Invited professor of the Faculty of Science at Azad Islamic University, Tehran campuses Tehran, Iran Javadi_hossein@hotmail.com
b) Academic Researcher, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology, University of Tehran. Tehran, Iran fforouz@ut.ac.ir
Published: April, 4, 2014
Abstract: In general relativity, gravity is a consequence of curves in space and time that works perfectly for describing gravity on the macroscopic scale. But when general relativity equations for calculating the outcomes of gravitational interactions are applied to the smallest possible ripples in the space-time fabric the bundles of energy known as gravitons the calculations go with infinities. Physicists have searched for a theory of quantum gravity for 80 years. Though gravitons are individually too weak to detect, most physicists believe the particles roam the quantum realm in drove, and that their behavior somehow collectively gives rise to the macroscopic force of gravity, just as light is a macroscopic effect of particles called photons. But every proposed theory of how gravity particles might behave faces the same problem: upon close inspection, it doesn’t make mathematical sense [1]. Most theories containing gravitons suffer from severe problems. Attempts to extend the Standard Model or other quantum field theories by adding gravitons run into serious theoretical difficulties at high energies because of infinities arising due to quantum effects. Since classical general relativity and quantum mechanics seem to be incompatible at such energies, from a theoretical point of view this situation is not tenable. One possible solution is to replace particles by strings. String theories are quantum theories of gravity in the sense that they reduce to classical general relativity plus field theory at low energies, but are fully quantum mechanical, contain a graviton, and are believed to be mathematically consistent. So, to date there is no way to explain the process that describes how particles as photon absorb gravitons. We have studied years long the relationship between gravity and photon in the blue shift phenomena. According to the results of this research we can claim definitely say that there are a few fundamental problems in theoretical physics that causes all these efforts reach to fail. These problems barricade we monitor physical phenomena with the law of nature and not by our laws. We can separate our theories and laws for explaining macroscopic and microscopic phenomena, but nature does not. At the beginning of the 20th century, Newton’s second law was corrected considering the limit speed c and the relativistic mass. If we ignore the zero rest mass and modify the relativistic Newton’s second law, then much better and more real physical phenomena would be explainable. The speed of the created particles is a function of the internal interaction and the mechanism of creation of subatomic particles, and the external forces that are exerted on them. Quantum gravity using the gauge interaction of a spin-2 field for graviton fails to work the way that the photon and other gauge bosons do. Maxwell's equations always admit a spin-1, linear wave, but Einstein's equations rarely admit a spin-2, linear wave, and when they do it is not exact. However, in the present article the photon is made of gravitons. To resolve this problem, according to gravitational blueshift we need explain this process is using color charged and magnetic color concept that derived from quantum chromodynamics and photon properties for gravitons .
Full story: General Science Journal
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Newest articles
|
|
Sub quantum space and interactions from photon to fermions and bosons |
Interesting articles
Since 1962 I doubted on Newton's laws. I did not accept the infinitive speed and I found un-vivid the laws of gravity and time.
I learned the Einstein's Relativity, thus I found some answers for my questions. But, I had another doubt of Infinitive Mass-Energy. And I wanted to know why light has stable speed?