|
November 2, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of Newton’s Second
Law Englishview
October 13, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of the Newton’s
Second Law Persianview
November 24, 2008: A New Definition of Gravitonview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
June 28, 2007: Unification and CPH Theoryview
June 14, 2007: Summary of Physics Conceptsview
June 14, 2007: Strong Interaction and CPH Theory Rview
June 4, 2007: Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theoryview
November 30, 2006: Vocabulary of CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Thermodynamic Laws Entropy and CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Time Function and Absolute Black Holeview
October 14, 2006: CPH and Timeview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Newton's Second Lawview
October 13, 2006: Time Function and Work Energy Theoremview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Special Relativityview
October 13, 2006: Properties of CPHview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 11, 2006: Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPHview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 19, 2006: Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPHview
March 19, 2006: Sub-Quantum Chromodynamicsview
|
|
|
|
|
|
Higgs Boson Given Less Space
To Hide |
|
| |
|
Higgs Boson Given Less Space To Hide
Analyzing several years' worth of results from Fermilab's Tevatron
collider, physicists come up with the most accurate measurement to
date of the mass of the W boson, and narrow down the possible mass
of the still undiscovered Higgs boson
Over the past three decades or more, physicists have developed their
experimental and theoretical understanding of the world of subatomic
particles into a comprehensive theory known as the standard model.
Much of the standard model has been verified and tested, but one
particle--the Higgs boson--has so far escaped detection.

The Higgs boson is a crucial element in the electroweak part of the
standard model, which provides a unified theoretical account of the
electromagnetic interaction and the weak nuclear interaction
(involved in radioactive beta decay, among other things). The W and
Z bosons, also predicted by electroweak unification, were found more
than 25 years ago, but final confirmation of this part of the
standard model must wait for conclusive detection of the Higgs
boson.
That goal has come a little nearer with two recent announcements,
both the result of years of data collection and analysis, from
experimental teams at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in
Batavia, Illinois. One achievement is the most precise measurement
yet of the W boson's mass. The other shrinks the mass range where
the Higgs boson--if indeed it exists--must be hiding. The teams
released their news at the Rencontres de Moriond, an annual particle
physics meeting that ran from March 7-14, 2009, in the Italian Alps.
At Fermilab's Tevatron, protons and antiprotons speed around a
circular track two kilometers in diameter, accelerated to energies
close to 1 Teraelectronvolt (TeV). The beams are steered so that
they cross at two places in the Tevatron ring, where vast and
complex detection systems stand ready to capture and analyze the
showers of fast-moving particles that erupt from proton-antiproton
collisions. Physicists cannot detect the W or the Higgs boson
directly. When created in a collision, each particle lives only a
tiny fraction of second before decaying into other particles--and
it's certain telltale combinations of those secondary particles that
scientists look for.
In experiments at DZero, one of the Tevatron's two detector
stations, physicists compiled a total of 499,830 collision events,
collected from 2002 to 2006, in which a W briefly appeared before
decaying into an electron and an electron neutrino. Because the
weakly interacting neutrino escapes unscathed from the detector, the
total momentum of the detected collision debris will show an
imbalance. In this case, the signature that the DZero physicists
looked for is a fast-moving electron coupled with missing momentum.
To estimate the W's mass, the scientists carried out randomized
computer simulations of collisions, for different hypothetical
values of the W mass, to see what value gave the best fit to the
electron energies and trajectories in the nearly half million
recorded events. They conclude that the W mass is 80.401
Gigaelectronvolts (GeV), with an uncertainty of 0.044 GeV--the most
accurate measurement to date. (Using Einstein's rule that E = mc2,
physicists routinely measure particle masses in energy units. On
this scale the proton's mass is 0.938 GeV). Adding the new result to
the existing set of W mass measurements will lead to a small upward
revision of the previous "world average" mass estimate, which stood
at 80.399 GeV, and more significantly will reduce the overall
uncertainty in that value.
Searching for the Higgs boson is a more demanding task yet.
Collisions can produce Higgs bosons in a variety of ways, and
several distinct decay modes lead to a variety of experimental
signature that physicists must look for. To tackle this complex
task, teams from DZero and from the Collider Detector at Fermilab
(CDF), the Tevatron's other detection system, pooled data collected
over many years. Computer simulations to compare the data with
projected results for a given Higgs mass are also more complicated,
since they have to juggle several different Higgs production and
decay possibilities to settle on a "best fit" to all the
experimental results.
The Fermilab experiments have not yet found a Higgs boson, but that
negative result limits the mass it might have. Scientists already
knew that the Higgs mass must be greater than 114 GeV, or it would
have been found already. And a combination of other experimental
evidence and theoretical arguments mean that the mass cannot be more
185 GeV. The DZero and CDF teams now add a further restriction,
concluding that there's less than one chance in 20 that the Higgs
could have a mass between 160 and 170 GeV. The Fermilab experiments
were particularly sensitive in that range because a Higgs with that
mass would create an experimental signature that's easier to detect.
Both teams continue to run experiments, and by the end of 2010 they
should have more than doubled the number of events they have
collected and analyzed so far. That amount of data should allow the
scientists to extend the sensitivity of their search to the full
mass range and to get close to either finding the Higgs boson or
beginning to suspect that it may not exist. Either conclusion would
be momentous.
David Lindley, National Science Foundation
Related Articles
Source: Red
Orbit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
@2003-2012 The CPH theory, All right reserved
|