|
November 2, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of Newton’s Second
Law Englishview
October 13, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of the Newton’s
Second Law Persianview
November 24, 2008: A New Definition of Gravitonview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
June 28, 2007: Unification and CPH Theoryview
June 14, 2007: Summary of Physics Conceptsview
June 14, 2007: Strong Interaction and CPH Theory Rview
June 4, 2007: Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theoryview
November 30, 2006: Vocabulary of CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Thermodynamic Laws Entropy and CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Time Function and Absolute Black Holeview
October 14, 2006: CPH and Timeview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Newton's Second Lawview
October 13, 2006: Time Function and Work Energy Theoremview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Special Relativityview
October 13, 2006: Properties of CPHview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 11, 2006: Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPHview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 19, 2006: Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPHview
March 19, 2006: Sub-Quantum Chromodynamicsview
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric motor polarizes opinion |
|
| |
|
Electric motor polarizes opinion
Fierce debate rages around entrepreneur Thane Heins' dogged
pursuit of green engine
Tyler Hamilton
ENERGY REPORTER
Thane Heins, tired and a little grumpy after a long flight from
California, walks onto the stage of an Ottawa conference room and
begins a sales pitch that usually raises more eyebrows than money.
One of three entrepreneurs chosen earlier this month to present at a
Pitch The Dragons contest, a spin on the CBC show Dragons
Den, Heins has invented a technology that he says will put out
more energy than it consumes. His invention, he boldly claims,
offers a way to make electric cars that can travel hundreds of
kilometres from the energy in a small, inexpensive battery.

CHRISTOPHER PIKE/FOR THE TORONTO STAR
Ottawa inventor Thane Heins is steadily winning supporters for
his electrical motor, which he claims can produce more energy
than it consumes. While many are skeptical of the theory, no one
has been able to disprove it. (Feb. 12, 2009)
Its a tough crowd. One of the contest judges is TV-show judge
Robert Herjavec, a multimillionaire who just minutes earlier shared
with the audience his own story of success and the life it now funds
- the fancy gas-guzzling cars, the mansion, the luxurious yacht.
The two men are oil and water. Heins, who wants to help the world
kick its fossil-fuel addiction, immediately gets his back up.
Herjavec is dismissive from the get-go.
It turned into a shouting match in front of 300 people, Heins says
later that day. I didnt mind him kicking sand in my face, but the
thing that really got me is when he said I dont get it. He pushed
me a little too far and I fought back.
It was just another day for this underdog entrepreneur, a man trying
to convince mainstream society he has discovered something real,
which in this case means it has broken a major law of physics.
The Star first
profiled Heins and his controversial invention a year ago. In a
nutshell, he had figured out a way to eliminate the electromagnetic
friction that typically limits the performance of an electrical
generator an effect known as Back EMF. Not only that, but he
also learned how to redirect that magnetic energy so that, instead
of causing resistance, it gave an electrical motor connected to the
generator a significant boost.
The result, as far as Heins was concerned, violated Lenzs law or
whats often called the law of diminishing returns. For many, that
equates to a perpetual motion machine, an impossible claim in the
conventional field of physics.
Within no time the story spread globally across the Internet, became
chatter on blogs, and triggered a flood of email to this reporters
inbox some praising Heins for his determination, others calling
the Star irresponsible for giving credibility to his claim. The
story, love it or hate it, was the second-most read article on TheStar.com in
2008.
Much has happened over the past 12 months. Heins still operates out
of a lab out at the University of Ottawa, he continues to evolve his
invention, and he routinely demonstrates those improvements to the
world by posting videos on YouTube.
The last video I watched still showed evidence of some fundamental
misunderstandings of physics, combined with wishful thinking, said
Seanna Watson, an electrical engineer who is also a member of a
scientific group called Ottawa Skeptics.
Heins gave the group a demonstration of his technology shortly at
the Stars story was published. Two months later Watson posted a
critique online titled In This Town We Obey The Law of
Thermodynamics. Yes, she admitted, the electrical motor does speed
up without any increase in input power, but increased speed does not
automatically mean an increase in mechanical work.
Heins appears earnest and basically honest, but persistently
self-deluded, Watson wrote. While the speed-up behaviour of the
generator currently lacks an established explanation, there is no
reason to think that it represents any challenge to currently known
laws of physics.
Its a criticism Heins has heard before: You havent proved youre
right, so you must be wrong. At the same time, nobody has been able
to prove hes wrong.
Some want to believe, or have kept an inquiring mind. Heins has been
contacted by NASA, hes had several investors, entrepreneurs,
engineers and academics show up at his lab for a demonstration.
Heins always obliges -- he says he has nothing to hide.
At one point last spring, rock legend Neil Young wanted to adapt
Heins invention to power a 1959 Lincoln Continental MK IV, which is
being entered into the $10-million automotive X-Prize a contest in
search of the worlds most efficient automobile.
Heins, Young, and his engineer Uli Kruger had much dialogue over
email and telephone about the rock stars LincVolt project. At one
point, Heins sent Young some information by email on the performance
of his generator and copied the message to dozens of other people
unrelated to Youngs project.
Young replied to Heins that he didnt appreciate his private email
being broadcast to the world. Please do not do this again! he
wrote, but then quickly breezed over the incident. This in no way
negates my enthusiasm and curiosity about your project, he assured
Heins.
Heins, not one to worship the famous, sent a terse response: I just
sent you an email with proof that my generator violates the Law of
Conservation of Energy and you are worried about your private email?
Are you serious? He accused Toronto-born Young of being shallow.
The relationship eventually fizzled. Two week after that exchange,
Young, in an email to the Star,
was still gracious in his assessment of Heins invention. I am
impressed it is on our list of things to watch.
Day by day, bit by bit, Heins passion and persistence is steadily
gaining him supporters people convinced that what theyre seeing
is important enough to move the technology out of the lab and into
real-world applications.
Through his Ottawa-based company Potential Difference Inc., Heins
has been in serious talks with a designer of small wind turbines in
Montreal, a senior engineer from a large utility in Turkey, and a
small manufacturer of electrical equipment in Toronto. Hes altered
the design of his prototype as well by developing a high-voltage
self-excited motor coil.
We can use it to accelerate (the motor shaft) from 100 revolutions
per minute to 3,500 without adding an ounce of power, according to
Heins.
His most promising partnership so far is with California Diesel &
Power, a $10-million company that sells back-up generators for
cellphone towers throughout California. AT&T is one of its
Source: http://www.thestar.com/News/Ontario/article/594471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
@2003-2012 The CPH theory, All right reserved
|