Home

Archive

English

Persian

contact us

 

 

 

 

Links 

Articles

Cern Experiment and Violatin of Newton's Second Law

 

LEIBNIZ'S MONADS AND JAVADI'S CPH

World Science Database

General Science Journal

Hadronic Journal

National Research Council Canada

 

 

November 2, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of Newton’s Second Law Englishview
 

October 13, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of the Newton’s Second Law Persianview
 

November 24, 2008: A New Definition of Gravitonview
 

July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
 

July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
 

June 28, 2007: Unification and CPH Theoryview
 

June 14, 2007: Summary of Physics Conceptsview
 

June 14, 2007: Strong Interaction and CPH Theory Rview
 

June 4, 2007: Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theoryview
 

November 30, 2006: Vocabulary of CPH Theoryview
 

November 17, 2006: Thermodynamic Laws Entropy and CPH Theoryview
 

November 17, 2006: Time Function and Absolute Black Holeview
 

October 14, 2006: CPH and Timeview
 

October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Newton's Second Lawview
 

October 13, 2006: Time Function and Work Energy Theoremview
 

October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Special Relativityview
 

October 13, 2006: Properties of CPHview
 

July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge Particlesview
 

July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge Particlesview
 

May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
 

May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
 

April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
 

April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
 

April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
 

April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
 

April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
 

April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
 

April 11, 2006: Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPHview
 

April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
 

April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
 

April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
 

April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
 

March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
 

March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
 

March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
 

March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
 

March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
 

March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
 

March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
 

March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
 

March 19, 2006: Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPHview
 

March 19, 2006: Sub-Quantum Chromodynamicsview
 

 

 

 

 

More Faults Found in LHC, But No Further Delay to Start-up

 

 

 
 



 


 

More Faults Found in LHC, But No Further Delay to Start-up

 

 

Written by Ian O'Neill

The LHC repairs are progressing well (CERN)

In September 2008, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) suffered a catastrophic quench, triggered by a faulty connection in the electronics connecting two of the supercooled magnets between Sections 3 and 4 of the 27 km-circumference particle accelerator. The "S34-incident" caused tonnes of helium coolant to explosively leak into the LHC tunnel, ripping the heavy electromagnets from their concrete mounts.

 

Naturally, this was a huge blow for CERN, delaying the first particle collisions by several months. However, the repair work is progressing well, and hopes are high for commencement of LHC science as early as this summer. Now engineers are working hard to avoid a recurrence of the S34 Incident, tracking down similar electrical faults between the accelerator magnets. It seems like they have found many more faults than expected

According to a recently published progress report, the LHC repairs are progressing as planned, but more electrical faults have been discovered in other sections of the accelerator. An electrical short has been blamed for the quench four months ago, only weeks after the first circulation of protons around the LHC in the beginning of September 2008. It is now of paramount importance to isolate any further potential shorts in the complex experiment. It would appear engineers are doing a good job in tracking them down.

Ribbons of superconducting niobium-titanium wire is used by the LHC to carry thousands of amps of current to the magnets. Connecting the ribbon from electromagnet-to-electromagnet are splices that are soldered in place. Should one of these splices be weakened by poor soldering, an electrical short can occur, making the magnets lose superconductivity, initiating a quench, rapidly heating the sensitive equipment. Various sections are being re-examined and re-soldered. The good news is that this additional work is not compounding the delay any further.

It has been confirmed that there was a lack of solder on the splice joint. Each sector has more than 2500 splices and a single defective splice can now be identified in situ when the sector is cold. Using this method another magnet showing a similar defect has been identified in sector 6-7. This sector will be warmed and the magnet removed. The warm up of this additional sector can be performed in the shadow of the repair to sector 3-4 and will therefore not add any additional delay to the restart schedule.  CERN

Hopefully we'll see a second circulation of protons this summer, and according to informal rumours from a contact involved in the LHC science, the first particle collisions could start as early as October 2009. I will listen out for any further official confirmation of this information

Sources: CERN, Nature.com

 

Source: http://www.universetoday.com/2009/02/02/more-faults-found-in-lhc-but-no-further-delay-to-start-up/

 

Waiting for the Higgs Boson

Elizabeth Kolbert on the Large Hadron Collider :

To theorists, the tantalizing promise of the L.H.C. is that it will, finally, supply the evidence of new physics that theyve been waiting for. Certain patterns of missing energy, for example, would suggest the existence of extra dimensions, as would the creation of mini black holes. Different resultsalso in the form of missing energywould indicate the existence of squarks or other superparticles. There are good theoretical reasons to expect these phenomena to begin to appear at the energy level of the L.H.C., or so at least Arkani-Hamed tried to explain to me over several more espressos. He told me that he was completely confident the Higgs would be found at the collider: I would bet many, many months salary. He also said that if the Higgs was the only result, the L.H.C. would be a disappointment. We theorists, were a hard lot to please. Weve taken things for granted for so long we say, Oh, yeah, for sure youll discover the Higgs. But the things were really interested in are all these major puzzles.

Brian Greene talks about the promise offered by LHC in finding the Higgs Boson:

where does mass itself come from?

More than 40 years ago, a number of researchers, including Peter Higgs, an English physicist, suggested an answer: perhaps space is pervaded by a field, much like the electromagnetic fields generated by cellphones and radio broadcasts, that acts like invisible molasses.

When we push something in the effort to make it move faster, the Higgs molasses would exert a drag force and its this resistance, as the Higgs theory goes, that we commonly call the objects mass. Scientists have incorporated this idea as a centerpiece of the so-called standard model a refined mathematical edifice, viewed by many as the crowning achievement of particle physics, that since the 1970s has described the behavior of natures basic constituents with unprecedented accuracy.

The one component of the standard model that remains stubbornly unconfirmed is the very notion of the Higgs molasses field. However, collisions at the Large Hadron Collider should be able to chip off little chunks of the ubiquitous Higgs field (if it exists), creating what are known as Higgs bosons or Higgs particles. If these particles are found, the standard model, more than a quarter-century after its articulation, will finally be complete.

Its totally irrelevant, but I enjoyed the bad web design of the LHC site. Compare toNASA and Fermilab

Martin Schmaltz writes another introduction. Steven Hawking bets that people wont find the Higgs boson, and that would make physics even more interesting.

I get all gushy about big science, if only because it is completely beyond my comprehension. As I look through Wikipedia, its clear to me how often theoretical possibilities inspire great science fiction.  (See also this).  By the way, currently, LHC is down for repairs; expected to come online again in July 2009. Wikipedia says it might take up to 3 years to gather enough data to prove or disprove the existence of the Higgs boson.

Joel Aschenbach defends basic science projects like LHC:

Some U.S. money has gone into the LHC, which will cost billions of dollars: five, maybe tenthe exact number is elusive (the science will be precise, but the accounting apparently follows the Uncertainty Principle). But most of the engineering is being done by European firms. Jrgen Schukraft, who supervises an LHC experiment named ALICE (which will re-create conditions the same as those just after the big bang), said, "The brain drain that used to go from Europe to the States definitely has reversed."

The cynic might say that theres no practical use for any of this, that there might be other uses for all the money and brainpower going into these particle guns. But we live in a civilization shaped by physics. We know that the forces within an atom are so powerful that, unleashed and directed against humanity, they can obliterate cities in an instant. The laptop computer on which Im writing uses microprocessors that would not exist had we not discovered quantum physics and the quirky behavior of electrons. This story will be posted on the World Wide Webinvented, in case you hadnt heard, at CERN, by computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee. Maybe youre reading it while listening to your iPod, which wouldnt exist but for something called "giant magnetoresistance." Two physicists discovered it independently in the late 1980s, with not much thought of how it might eventually be used. It became crucial to making tiny consumer electronics that used magnetized hard disks. The physicists won a Nobel Prize in 2007, and you got a nifty sound system thats smaller than a Hershey bar.

 

Source: http://www.imaginaryplanet.net/weblogs/idiotprogrammer/?p=83400287

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 


 

 

 

 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Newest articles

 


 

Interesting articles

Faster Than Light 

Light that travels… faster than light!

Before the Big Bang

Structure of Charge Particles

Move Structure of Photon

Structure of Charge Particles

Faster Than Light 

Light that travels… faster than light!

Before the Big Bang

Structure of Charge Particles

Move Structure of Photon

Structure of Charge Particles

Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equation [PDF] Persian Text


 
Unification and CPH Theory [PDF] 


Strong Interaction and CPH Theory [PDF]


Summary of Physics Concepts [PDF]


Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theory [PDF] 


Vocabulary of CPH Theory [PDF] 


Thermodynamic Laws, Entropy and CPH Theory [PDF]


Time Function and Absolute Black Hole [PDF] 


CPH and Time [PDF]Persian Text Only


Time Function and Work Energy Theorem [PDF] Persian Text Only 


Properties of CPH [PDF]Persian Text Only 


CPH Theory and Special Relativity [PDF] Persian Text Only


CPH Theory and Newton's Second Law [PDF] Persian Text Only 

 

A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge Particles [PDF] Persian Text 


Logical Foundation of CPH Theory [PDF] Persian Text 


Experimental Foundation of CPH Theory [PDF] Persian Text 


Definition, Principle and Explanation of CPH Theory [PDF] Persian Text


 
Analysis of CPH Theory Persian Text


Opinions on CPH Theory [PDF] Persian Text


 
Questions and Answers on CPH Theory [PDF] Persian Text


 
Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPH [PDF]Persian Text Only


 
Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Field [PDF] Persian Text


 
Effective Nuclear Charge [PDF] Persian Text


 
Color Charges Curve Space [PDF] Persian Text 


Sub-Quantum Chromodynamics [PDF]


 
Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPH [PDF]


 
Speed of Light and CPH Theory [PDF] Persian Text

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 

free hit counters

 


 

@2003-2012 The CPH theory, All right reserved