|
November 2, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of Newton’s Second
Law Englishview
October 13, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of the Newton’s
Second Law Persianview
November 24, 2008: A New Definition of Gravitonview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
June 28, 2007: Unification and CPH Theoryview
June 14, 2007: Summary of Physics Conceptsview
June 14, 2007: Strong Interaction and CPH Theory Rview
June 4, 2007: Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theoryview
November 30, 2006: Vocabulary of CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Thermodynamic Laws Entropy and CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Time Function and Absolute Black Holeview
October 14, 2006: CPH and Timeview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Newton's Second Lawview
October 13, 2006: Time Function and Work Energy Theoremview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Special Relativityview
October 13, 2006: Properties of CPHview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 11, 2006: Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPHview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 19, 2006: Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPHview
March 19, 2006: Sub-Quantum Chromodynamicsview
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 Light Years Away, HD
80606b Positively Sizzles |
|
| |
|
Astronomers have observed the intense heating of a distant planet as
it swung close to its parent star, providing important clues to the
atmospheric properties of the planet. With that data, astronomers
at the University of California, Santa Cruz were able to generate
'realistic' images of the planet by feeding the data into computer
simulations of the planet's atmosphere. The researchers used
NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope to obtain infrared measurements of
the heat emanating from the planet as it whipped behind and close to
its star. In just six hours, the planet's temperature rose from 800
to 1,500 Kelvin (980 to 2,240 degrees Fahrenheit).
Known as HD 80606b, the planet circles a star 200 light years from
Earth, is four times the mass of Jupiter, and has the most eccentric
orbit of any known planet. It spends most of its 111.4-day orbit at
distances that would place it between Venus and Earth in our own
solar system, while the closest part of its orbit brings it within
0.03 astronomical units of its star (one astronomical unit is the
distance between Earth and the Sun). The planet zips through this
dramatic close encounter with its star in less than a day.

The planet HD 80606b glows orange from its own heat in this
computer-generated image. A massive storm has formed in response to
the pulse of heat delivered during the planet's close swing past its
star. The blue crescent is reflected light from the star. Image by
D. Kasen, J. Langton, and G. Laughlin (UCSC).
"We can't get a direct image of the planet, but we can deduce what
it would look like if you were there. The ability to go beyond an
artist's interpretation and do realistic simulations of what you
would actually see is very exciting," said Gregory Laughlin,
professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC. Laughlin is lead
author of a new report on the findings published this week in Nature.
At the closest point, the sunlight beating down on the planet is 825
times stronger than the irradiation it receives at its farthest
point from the star. "If you could float above the clouds of this
planet, you'd see its sun growing larger and larger at faster and
faster rates, increasing in brightness by almost a factor of 1,000,"
Laughlin said.
Spitzer observed the planet for 30 hours before, during, and just
after its closest approach to the star. The planet passed behind the
star (an event called a secondary eclipse) just before the moment of
its closest approach. This was a lucky break for Laughlin and his
colleagues, who had not known that would happen when they planned
the observation. The secondary eclipse allowed them to get accurate
measurements from just the star and thereby determine exact
temperatures for the planet.
The extreme temperature swing observed by Spitzer indicates that the
intense irradiation from the star is absorbed in a layer of the
planet's upper atmosphere that absorbs and loses heat rapidly,
Laughlin said.
Coauthor Jonathan Langton, a postdoctoral researcher at UCSC, fed
the Spitzer data into a hydrodynamic model of the planet's
atmosphere to predict its response to the intense heating. Langton's
simulation shows the global storms and shockwaves unleashed in the
planet's atmosphere every 111 days as it swings close to its star.
"The initial response could be described as an explosion on the side
facing the star," Langton said. "As the atmosphere heats up and
expands, it produces very high winds, on the order of 5 kilometers
per second, flowing away from the day side toward the night side.
The rotation of the planet causes these winds to curl up into
large-scale storm systems that gradually die down as the planet
cools over the course of its orbit."
Daniel Kasen, a Hubble postdoctoral fellow at UCSC, was able to
generate photorealistic images of the planet using a program he
developed to calculate radiative transfer processes in astrophysics.
"It calculates the color and intensity of light coming from the
glowing planet, and also how starlight would reflect off the surface
of the planet," Kasen said.
The resulting images show a thin blue crescent of reflected
starlight framing the night side of the planet, which glows cherry
red from its own heat, like coals in a fire. "These images are far
more realistic than anything that's been done before for extrasolar
planets," Laughlin said.
If the planet's orbit is aligned just right, it will pass in front
of the star (an event known as a primary transit) on February 14.
Both professional and amateur astronomers worldwide will be watching
to see if this happens. The occurrence of primary transits would
enable astronomers to learn more about this unusual planet by
conducting spectroscopic observations.
HD 80606b was originally discovered in 2001 by a Swiss
planet-hunting team led by Dominique Naef of the Geneva Observatory,
Switzerland. Using a method known as the Doppler-velocity technique,
they detected the tell-tale wobble in the light from the star caused
by the gravitational tug of the planet.
Subsequent observations by Laughlin's colleagues on the
California&Carnegie Planet Search team--Steve Vogt at UCSC and Paul
Butler at the Carnegie Institute of Washington--provided precise
information about the planet's orbit, which was essential for
planning the Spitzer observations. Drake Deming of NASA's Goddard
Space Flight Center contributed his expertise to the analysis of the
Spitzer data. Other coauthors of the Nature paper include UCSC
postdoctoral researcher Eugenio Rivera and graduate student Stefano
Meschiari.
The Spitzer Space Telescope is operated by the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology (Caltech),
under contract to NASA. Support for this work was provided by NASA
through an award issued by JPL/Caltech.
Article: Laughlin, G., et al. Nature 457, 562-564 (2009)
Source: Scientific
Blogging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
@2003-2012 The CPH theory, All right reserved
|