Faster Than Light? More Like Faulty Wiring.
by JASON
MAJOR on FEBRUARY
22, 2012
Part of the OPERA project's
underground lab. Image credit: CORBIS/CERN
You can shelf your designs for a warp
drive engine (for now) and put the DeLorean back in
the garage; it turns out neutrinos may not have
broken any cosmic speed limits after all.
Ever since the news came out on
September 22 of last year that
a team of researchers in Italy had clocked neutrinos
traveling faster than the speed of light, the
physics world has been resounding with the potential
implications of such a discovery — that is, if it
were true. The speed of light has been a key
component of the standard model of physics for over
a century, an Einstein-established limit that
particles (even tricky neutrinos) weren’t supposed
to be able to break, not even a little.
Now, according to a breaking
news article by
Edwin Cartlidge on AAAS’ ScienceInsider,
the neutrinos may be cleared of any speed
violations.
“According to sources familiar with
the experiment, the 60 nanoseconds discrepancy
appears to come from a bad connection between a
fiber optic cable that connects to the GPS receiver
used to correct the timing of the neutrinos’ flight
and an electronic card in a computer,” Cartlidge
reported.
The original OPERA (Oscillation
Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus) experiment
had a beam of neutrinos fired from CERN in Geneva,
Switzerland, aimed at an underground detector array
located 730 km away at the Gran Sasso facility, near
L’Aquila, Italy. Researchers were surprised to
discover the neutrinos arriving earlier than
expected, by a difference of 60 nanoseconds. This
would have meant the neutrinos had traveled faster
than light speed to
get there.
Repeated experiments at the facility
revealed the same results. When the news was
released, the findings seemed to be solid — from a
methodological standpoint, anyway.
Shocked at their own results, the
OPERA researchers were more than happy to have
colleagues check their results, and welcomed other
facilities to attempt the same experiment.
Repeated attempts may no longer be
needed.
Once the aforementioned fiber optic
cable was readjusted, it was found that the speed of
data traveling through it matched the 60 nanosecond
discrepancy initially attributed to the neutrinos.
This could very well explain the subatomic
particles’ apparent speed burst.
Case closed? Well… it is science,
after all.
“New data,” Cartlidge added, “will be
needed to confirm this hypothesis.”
See the original OPERA team paper here.
UPDATE 2/22/12 11:48 pm EST:According
to a more recent article
on Nature’s newsblog, the
Science Insider report erroneously attributed the 60
nanosecond discrepancy to loose fiber optic wiring
from the GPS unit, based on inside “sources”.
OPERA’s statement doesn’t specify as such, “saying
instead that its two possible sources of error point
in opposite directions and it is still working
things out.”
OPERA’s official statement released
today is as follows:
“The OPERA Collaboration, by
continuing its campaign of verifications on the
neutrino velocity measurement, has identified two
issues that could significantly affect the reported
result. The first one is linked to the oscillator
used to produce the events time-stamps in between
the GPS synchronizations. The second point is
related to the connection of the optical fiber
bringing the external GPS signal to the OPERA master
clock.
These two issues can modify the
neutrino time of flight in opposite directions.
While continuing our investigations, in order to
unambiguously quantify the effect on the observed
result, the Collaboration is looking forward to
performing a new measurement of the neutrino
velocity as soon as a new bunched beam will be
available in 2012. An extensive report on the above
mentioned verifications and results will be shortly
made available to the scientific committees and
agencies.” (via Nature
newsblog.)
Source: Universe
Today
|