C reative
Particle
Higgs
CPH Theory is based on Generalized light velocity from energy into mass.
CPH Theory in Journals
|
Big bang or bulldust?
|
|
We are, according to big bang theory, travelling through space and time, expanding with the universe like surfers riding a big wave, or sultanas rising inside a cake mix. Since everything, including stars and galaxies, planets, sultanas even, is moving away from the big bang that created the universe up to 14 billion years ago, it figures that if you could rewind the cosmic clock, everything would meet back at a point the size of an atom - the so-called singularity thought to exist inside black holes. What caused this ‘seed’ of matter and energy, time and space, to expand into what we observe in space today remains a mystery. Straightforward? Not for a growing number of scientists who question the cosmological mainstream and accuse it of ‘fudging’ what cannot be confirmed through observational data. University of WA physicist John Hartnett is one of these scientists investigating alternative scenarios to how the universe formed. "We can't discount some of the incredible work that has been done," he says. "But some of the observational data to support the big bang is highly questionable." Professor Hartnett is one of many scientists who feel debate on alternative theories has been largely sidelined or shut down by the dominance of the big bang cosmological model. He says that the singularity at the start of the universe is one of the biggest single problems with the big bang model. "It's not a black hole, it has no event horizon, and it can't start expanding because it is supposed to be a super stable state of matter. "There's an assumption that it somehow starts expanding. And that when it starts we can use physics we know. You have to start at 10 to the minus 43 of a second after the actual expansion of the universe begins before you can start using physics." There is no physics to explain what triggered its existence. Prior to the singularity, nothing existed in the ‘void’ around it, not space, time, matter or energy. Scientists do not know where it came from. Another inconsistency is the cosmic microwave background radiation discovered in 1964. The radiation, measured at 2.73K or about minus 270C, is apparently the remnant glow from the big bang. In 1992, the NASA satellite COBE (or Cosmic Background Explorer) discovered the ‘ripples’, or clumps of matter and energy, in the background radiation. This was regarded as the clincher guaranteeing the supremacy of the big bang theory. The COBE results suggested the radiation had been produced in the very early stages of the universe, about 300,000 years after the singularity. "But the background radiation is not in the background in all galaxy clusters, which it should be if it comes from the big bang event," Professor Hartnett says. "Theories need evidence to back them up but a lot of the evidence supporting the big bang theory does not stack up." Some cosmic cracks in the big bang model:
Although widely held as the dominant cosmological A story provided by ScienceNetwork WA - Activate your connections to science. This article is under copyright; permission must be sought from ScienceNetwork WA to reproduce it. To comment on this article go to the original story here. Source: http://www.sciencealert.com.au/features/20080812-18554.html
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Newest articles
|
|
Sub quantum space and interactions from photon to fermions and bosons |
Interesting articles
Since 1962 I doubted on Newton's laws. I did not accept the infinitive speed and I found un-vivid the laws of gravity and time.
I learned the Einstein's Relativity, thus I found some answers for my questions. But, I had another doubt of Infinitive Mass-Energy. And I wanted to know why light has stable speed?