CPH THeory

Links

Articles

Cern Experiment and Violatin of Newton's Second Law

LEIBNIZ'S MONADS AND JAVADI'S CPH

World Science Database

General Science Journal

Hadronic Journal

National Research Council Canada

November 2, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of Newtonâ€™s Second Law Englishview

October 13, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of the Newtonâ€™s Second Law Persianview

November 24, 2008: A New Definition of Gravitonview

July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview

June 28, 2007: Unification and CPH Theoryview

June 14, 2007: Summary of Physics Conceptsview

June 14, 2007: Strong Interaction and CPH Theory Rview

June 4, 2007: Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theoryview

November 30, 2006: Vocabulary of CPH Theoryview

November 17, 2006: Thermodynamic Laws Entropy and CPH Theoryview

November 17, 2006: Time Function and Absolute Black Holeview

October 14, 2006: CPH and Timeview

October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Newton's Second Lawview

October 13, 2006: Time Function and Work Energy Theoremview

October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Special Relativityview

October 13, 2006: Properties of CPHview

July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge Particlesview

May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview

April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview

April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview

April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview

April 11, 2006: Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPHview

April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview

April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview

April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview

March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview

March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview

March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview

March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview

March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview

March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview

March 19, 2006: Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPHview

March 19, 2006: Sub-Quantum Chromodynamicsview

Binary stars

Binary stars

Binary stars of the same mass will have opposite spins.

This prediction is made in Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr's sensational new book "Universities Asleep at the Switch", a book coming out in December 2006 that you will see being sold at Amazon.com and the major book sellers.

See Web Site at http://www.amperefitz.com

And SPECIAL FOR YOU

Members of this group can preview the first 30 pages of this new book right now by clicking the link below:

http://www.amperefitz.com/us_20061020_ck_ds_jm_ds.pdf

(It may take time to fully load on slower computers.)

Binary stars act exactly like electrons

9/16/2005
© 2005

Binary stars spin around each other pro grade not retrograde just like planets do around the sun with their closest sides going in the same direction (like gears meshing, not clashing). . In other words one star is spin up and the other spin down.

If you click either of these links below

Binary Star simulation

http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/astro101/java/binary/binary.htm

and (in the top boxes) make the masses of the stars the same---as electrons are the same mass---then you will plainly see that these spin up - spin down stars are rotating around each other just as a spin up - spin down electron are doing in the lowest atomic orbital.

Slide the "e" slider to the left to give you no eccentricity. . This can be two binary stars when the surroundings are homogeneous and isotropic or it can be the two electrons in a helium atom.

Or you can slide the "e" slider more to the right to give you orbits of both binary stars and electrons where their surroundings are not homogeneous and isotropic.

This shows us that not only are electrons revolving around the nucleus, but they are revolving around themselves as well just like two binary stars. . This is the revolving action (orbiting) similar to the electron action that Niels Bohr explained and won the Nobel prize for about half a century ago.

The quarks inside the proton are what keep all electrons the same mass.

So while the symmetry of the microcosm is different from the macrocosm, they BOTH obey Ampere's Laws, which really tell us that behind the scenes out of phase resonances are creating spacetime and in phase resonances are creating no spacetime. . The average spacetime being produced by both are the Wolford centers that we at Theory of Everything Group keep being reminded about.

The reason for this is that every entity whether it's in the microcosm or macrocosm is a scalar standing wave resonance like Dr. Milo Wolff proved the electron to be, and like Huygens proved a preponderance of light quanta to be, long before we even knew the smallest bit of light was an individual quantum of energy.

This is the way the universe builds itself with individual quantum pieces building scalar standing wave resonances, every so often in frequency, like keys on a universe grand piano with a keyboard of infinite length.

A scalar standing wave resonance of one frequency is made up of tiny fractional portions of scalar standing wave resonances of the next higher frequency on the keyboard of this universe piano. . An electron, for instance, is made up of higher frequency de Broglie resonances (in the x-ray realm).

And this goes on and on and on ad infinitum.

So Charles Scott is right in his epic astronomy e-book that you can get FREE by clicking the red link below:

http://www.all-new-biz.com/id59.htm

Fitz

You can click these links below for more info.

web page

Fitzpatrick's First Book (FREE)