|
November 2, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of Newton’s Second
Law Englishview
October 13, 2011: CERN Experiment and Violation of the Newton’s
Second Law Persianview
November 24, 2008: A New Definition of Gravitonview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
July 10, 2007: Zero Point Energy and the Dirac Equationview
June 28, 2007: Unification and CPH Theoryview
June 14, 2007: Summary of Physics Conceptsview
June 14, 2007: Strong Interaction and CPH Theory Rview
June 4, 2007: Quantum Electrodynamics and CPH Theoryview
November 30, 2006: Vocabulary of CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Thermodynamic Laws Entropy and CPH Theoryview
November 17, 2006: Time Function and Absolute Black Holeview
October 14, 2006: CPH and Timeview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Newton's Second Lawview
October 13, 2006: Time Function and Work Energy Theoremview
October 13, 2006: CPH Theory and Special Relativityview
October 13, 2006: Properties of CPHview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
July 31, 2006: A New Mechanism of Higgs Bosons in Producing Charge
Particlesview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
May 14, 2006: Speed of Light and CPH Theoryview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 28, 2006: Color Charges Curve Spaceview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 17, 2006: Effective Nuclear Chargeview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 12, 2006: Maxwell's Equations in a Gravitational Fieldview
April 11, 2006: Realization Hawking - End of Physics by CPHview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Opinions on CPH Theoryview
April 7, 2006: Questions and Answers on CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 23, 2006: Analysis of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Logical Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Definition Principle and Explanation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 21, 2006: Experimental Foundation of CPH Theoryview
March 19, 2006: Color Charge/Color Magnet and CPHview
March 19, 2006: Sub-Quantum Chromodynamicsview
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Mathematical Mode for Effective Nuclear Charge |
|
| |
|
Introduction;
The effective nuclear charge (Z*) is
the "pull" that the specific electron "feels" from the nucleus. Of
the first time Slater did give a simple rule for calculate the
effective nuclear charge on any electron in any atoms in 1930.
Clementi and Raimondi did their work on effective nuclear charges in
the early 1960s. The results of Clementis method are difference of
Staler's rule. For example Clementi calculated as Sc
from a 4s perspective Z*=4.632,
but Staler's Z* are equal 3...
Staler's rule and Clementi's method
based on experiments. There is no any analytic method for why and
how the strongly of nuclear charge does lose? By according CPH
theory force and energy are equivalence. Force converts to energy
and energy changes to force. I will give a Mathematical Mode for
Effective Nuclear Charge by CPH Theory.
Mathematical Mode;
By according Theory of CPH, when a
force works on an object/particle, when W (work) is positive, force
converts to energy and when W<o, energy changes to force.
Suppose an atom with Z proton is at
stationary state, its Nuclear Charge Fz and Effective Nuclear Charge
on an electron is Fz*. In during Fz reaches to electron, its works
on other electrons is W, so Fw converts to energy E=W and electron
feels the effective nuclear charge equal Fz* that given by;
Fz*=Fz - Fw
Group each electron like
this:
(1s)(2s,2p)(3s,3p)(3d)(4s,4p)(4d)(4f)(5s,5p)(5d)(5f)...
Electrons to the right
of the electron you have chosen do not contribute.
Examples;
Suppose two objects A and B absorb
each other. By according CPH Theory a force particle leaves A and
pulls it toward B, when force particle reaches to B, another leaves
B and pulls it toward A and so on. In the following examples please
attend that electrons are moving in their orbits, but Fz (nuclear
charge) moves faster than electrons.
Hydrogen;
Hydrogen atom contains one proton and
one electron in 1s, so Fw=o and Fz=Fz*. Because there is no any
other electron in hydrogen atom and Fw=0. Clementi supposed Fz*=1
Helium;
Helium contains two protons and two
electrons in 1s. Fz=2 from two protons moves toward electron1.
Electron2 has electric charge and magnetic field. So, Fz acts on
electron2. But direction of Fz is toward the electron1. So,
electron2 does change direction of Fz. It depends to distance
between electrons in this orbit. Suppose this effect is nothing.
But, Fz works on electron2, energy of
electron2 increases and Fz loses a part of its strong. So, the
effective nuclear charge Fz* on electron1 given by;
Fz*=Fz - Fw
Energy of electron2 increases equal
E=W. It leaves its orbit. But electric force leaves it toward
nuclear and pulls electron2 toward nuclear. Also, electric force of
electron1 acts on it. Then electron2 comes back to its orbit and
loses energy E, and E converts to electric force equal Fw. Then Fw
does add to Fz* that is coming back of electron1 and Fz=Fz*+Fw
reaches to nuclear. So, nuclear feels that effective force of
electron1 is equal Fz.
The effective nuclear charge Fz* on
electron2 is same as electron1. By according Clementi calculate
Fz*=1.688
Lithium;
Lithium has 3 protons and 3 electrons,
two electrons are in 1s and one electron is in 2s.
For 1s;
Fz=3 from 3 protons moves toward
electron1 in 1s orbit . This case is same as Helium, but radius of
1s orbits is smaller than in Helium and distance between electrons
is less than Heliums orbit. So deviation direction of Fz is less
than in Helium. It shows the effect of deviation direction for Fz is
less than Helium. By according Clementi's calculate Fz*=2.691. Do
compare with Helium that Fz*=1.688.
For 2s;
There is one electron in orbit 2s in
Lithium. So, this electron feels Fz* that is coming of over the
orbit 1s. Fz=3 leaves nuclear toward it. Fz works on two electrons
in orbit 1s.
Fz loses Fw1 for act on electron1, and
Fw2 for act on electron2. So, when Fz reaches to orbit 1s, It comes
up to F'z=Fz - (Fw1+Fw2).
In during F'z is passing of orbit 1s,
it works on the sum of electron1 and electron2. Suppose this work is
equal Fw3.
So, Fw=Fw1+Fw2+Fw3 and Fz*=Fz-Fw
reaches to electron in orbit 2s. By according Clementi's calculation
Fz*=1.279.
When Fz* reaches to electron, then an
other electric force particle equal Fz* leaves it toward nuclear.
When it reaches to orbit 1s works on it. In during Fz* is passing of
orbit 1s, energy E=W converts to force Fw and Fz=Fz*+Fw reaches to
nuclear.
Summary;
For calculation the effective nuclear
charge Fz* on any electron in any atoms, we must calculate Fw. W is
the sum of works that Fz acts on electrons and orbits (or sub
orbits) before Fz reaches to it.
For example; For Na
from a 3s,
Na has 11 protons and 11
electrons, so;
A. 2 electrons in 1s,
Fw1
B. an orbit n1, Fw2
C. 6 electrons in 2p,
Fw3
D. a sub orbit 2p, Fw4
E. 2 electrons in 2s,
Fw5
F. an orbit n2, Fw6
So, Fw=Fw1+Fw2+Fw3+Fw4+Fw5+Fw6,
And Fz*=Fz-Fw
Sincerely
Hossein Javadi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
@2003-2012 The CPH theory, All right reserved
|